Jeffrey Kearney

hi Massimo

We will absolutely do another global conference. We are back in Billund in October (3-4th). I think you missed the 2016 conference, which explains why you didn’t know. We will post about it soon’ish
Per

hi Hugues

I have done this a couple of times, and the most surprising thing is that you do not have to adapt, or at least extremely little. The key difference is in how visually impaired see things, as my sponsor said it “but we see, we just see with our hands”. Thus, give the listeners time to feel the model, before or while the builder is…[Read more]

hi,
I have a bit of experience with this, and know of some experiences done previously by the LEGO Group. There are certainly some challenges in creating 100/100. Calendar permitting, I would be happy to participate
Per

hi
Furhter to Onno’s post, consder putting this line to it

LEGO®, the LEGO® logo, the Brick, Knob configuration and the Minifigure are trademarks of the LEGO Group.

And, be carefull with the writing of LEGO SERIOUS PLAY inside the other colour and in grey color. This could be intepreted as a violation of the logo and trademark

Dear Alexander

The short answer would be that the sets are costly but not expensive. The kits, in particular, the connections kit contain a lot of special elements that are expensive to produce. Historically, LEGO has kept the same margin on the LSP products as on any. In periods it has even been lower, but I believe that it has been adjust to…[Read more]

hi Hisham

Would be delighted to connect on skype, certain that Robert is equally available

My skypename is pkristia

Per
–

Hisham
Sorry if I missed your call, I am doing a training in India, so am a bit unavailable

Your questions can be answered from several perspectives: 1) From LEGO trademarks and 2) From the Assocation of Master Trainers

I will try to the real broad outline, and then would be more than happy to speak on the phone

Generally, what LEGO care about…[Read more]

Jon,
Little to add to the rich answers from Joyce and Marko, only want to share that I have found it important to keep the documentation as close to their language as possible, i.e. really use the metaphors and keep them alive. This helps carry the result into the workplace afterwards
Good luck
Per

hi Patrizia

Indeed

Could perhaps also be topic for a building exercise at a break out session at the LSP days later this year…

A presto
Per

hi Patrizia
Your question is far from stupid, however it may have two sides to it:

Do you mean what defines something as LEGO SERIOUS PLAY – in that case we would often turn to the core process. If one does not adhere to the core process, then it is not LSP

Do you mean defining what it does or is, ie a method etc – in this case we often talk…[Read more]

hi Jim
LEGO does not as such authorize any programs, they have looked into how they could, but have not yet found the right approach. The program that I offer is the one endorsed and developed by the Association of Master Trainers (of which I am founding member).

I used to be one one the two master trainers at LEGO (Robert Rasmussen being the…[Read more]

Hi Jim

Adding my voice to the great posts by Pete and Marko: If you are to dive into some of Johans writing then see if you can find “The next common sense”, he wrote it together with Michael Lissack, or possible some of the white papers written at Imagination Lab.

hi Alan
A quick note to follow up on some of the great input from Eli, Peter and Marko. Indeed time seems to be an issue, as well as the fact that the new system is not perfect. If you decide to go for LSP, I would suggest that use the methods power to get the truth in the open, label it and move on. I would always prefer to show respect to their…[Read more]