Gary Mankellow

Jon,
Little to add to the rich answers from Joyce and Marko, only want to share that I have found it important to keep the documentation as close to their language as possible, i.e. really use the metaphors and keep them alive. This helps carry the result into the workplace afterwards
Good luck
Per

hi Patrizia

Indeed

Could perhaps also be topic for a building exercise at a break out session at the LSP days later this year…

A presto
Per

hi Patrizia
Your question is far from stupid, however it may have two sides to it:

Do you mean what defines something as LEGO SERIOUS PLAY – in that case we would often turn to the core process. If one does not adhere to the core process, then it is not LSP

Do you mean defining what it does or is, ie a method etc – in this case we often talk…[Read more]

hi Jim
LEGO does not as such authorize any programs, they have looked into how they could, but have not yet found the right approach. The program that I offer is the one endorsed and developed by the Association of Master Trainers (of which I am founding member).

I used to be one one the two master trainers at LEGO (Robert Rasmussen being the…[Read more]

Hi Jim

Adding my voice to the great posts by Pete and Marko: If you are to dive into some of Johans writing then see if you can find “The next common sense”, he wrote it together with Michael Lissack, or possible some of the white papers written at Imagination Lab.

hi Alan
A quick note to follow up on some of the great input from Eli, Peter and Marko. Indeed time seems to be an issue, as well as the fact that the new system is not perfect. If you decide to go for LSP, I would suggest that use the methods power to get the truth in the open, label it and move on. I would always prefer to show respect to their…[Read more]

hi Andreas

Have you tried to reach out to Eli de Friend (eli@caprese.org) and Joyce Miller (joyce@caprese.org) in Aubonne, near Lausanne?

Good luck

Per